![]() Leslie has taken on almost every responsibility possible at one time or another, and has become one of the most knowledgeable leaders in the Corps Movement, sought out for her wisdom, command of Corps history, and expertise in AmeriCorps programs and initiatives. Since she began, Leslie has planned numerous conferences, designed and edited a quarterly newsletter, and directed member services. Leslie began with the Human Environment Center in 1984 and transitioned to The Corps Network when it was created in 1985. Leslie Wilkoff Director of Corpsmember Assistance Before joining The Corps Network in 2022, Ed worked as a Communications Lead for Environment for The Americas and managed the nonprofit’s various internship social media accounts.Įd currently lives in Colorado and enjoys playing roller hockey, petting dogs/cats, and exploring natural spaces. Ed also spent a summer interning on Capitol Hill as a congressional intern and later completed a 6-month internship with the Bureau of Land Management at Yaquina Head Outstanding Natural Area. During college, Ed volunteer coached for a special needs travel ice hockey team in Indianapolis (Go Twisters!) and served as a teaching assistant at DePauw University and Ewha Women’s University in Seoul, South Korea. Born in Texas and raised in the Midwest, Ed received his bachelor’s degree in Political Science with a minor in Media Studies from DePauw University. Nous évaluons les forces et les défis des programmes de PSE par rapport aux modalités antérieures de conservation.As a Communications Associate, Ed supports The Corps Network Communications Team by creating media content and managing social media platforms. Nos conclusions permettent de conceptualiser les PSE comme un nouvel outil dans l’histoire continue de la gestion et de la dépossession des terres par les gouvernements des colonisateurs. Les façons dont ces programmes de PSE risquent de réduire à l’état d’objet et de limiter la portée des connaissances autochtones n’ont pas encore été suffisamment analysées dans les approches actuelles de PSE. Nos conclusions touchent trois thèmes qui ont une incidence spécifique sur les fournisseurs autochtones de services écosystémiques: (1) le droit internationalement reconnu du consentement libre, préalable et éclairé des peuples autochtones, (2) le renforcement de la compétence des colonisateurs et (3) les incompatibilités entre les connaissances autochtones et les approches de type PSE. S’inspirant des discours sur l’autodétermination, le statut de nation et les responsabilités culturelles des peuples autochtones, le présent texte étudie la façon dont les programmes de PSE produisent des résultats uniques pour les peuples autochtones à titre de fournisseurs de services écosystémiques. On retrouve souvent ces programmes dans des territoires non cédés, contestés ou non reconnus autrement sur le plan juridique tels que les territoires autochtones ainsi que les terres et les territoires de régime coutumier. Les programmes de Paiements pour les services écosystémiques (PSE) sont en voie de restructurer la gouvernance des écosystèmes et des ressources naturelles partout dans le monde. Les peuples autochtones, les communautés locales et les paiements pour les services écosystémiques fr We assess the strengths and challenges of PES programs as a departure from previous conservation modalities. Our findings enable a conceptualization of PES as a new conservation tool within ongoing histories of land management and dispossession by settler colonial governments. The ways that PES programs run the risk of reifying and reducing Indigenous knowledges have not yet been adequately considered within current PES approaches. Our findings demonstrate and substantiate three themes that impact Indigenous ecosystem services providers uniquely: (1) the internationally recognized right to Free, Prior and Informed Consent for Indigenous peoples (2) the reinforcement of settler colonial jurisdiction and (3) mismatches between Indigenous knowledges and PES-type approaches. Building on the discourses of Indigenous self-determination, nationhood, and cultural responsibilities, this paper examines how PES programs produce unique outcomes for Indigenous peoples as ecosystem services providers. These programs often occur in spaces that are unceded, contested, or otherwise not legally recognized as Indigenous homelands, customary areas, and territories. Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) programs are reshaping the governance of ecosystems and natural resources around the world. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |